<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five— Rebrand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/</link>
	<description>Design inspiration from around the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: racar</title>
		<link>http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/#comment-15856</link>
		<dc:creator>racar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formfiftyfive.com/?p=2820#comment-15856</guid>
		<description>of course its looks like a logo for Daz.. Five is the Tv equivalent. I&#039;ve been trying to look at this rebrand objectively as I think Dixon Baxi are usually extremely good.. however... The logo I can understand. The old Five identity (although I loved it visually) was aloof at times and didn&#039;t really fit with the &#039;brand&#039;. it was a well thought through stylised look for an ill thought through channel of crap. this one fits the bill much better. its brash, it feels a bit throw away and it&#039;ll date in weeks. the idents are a strange collection, its a lovely idea to commission different idents from different artists but I don&#039;t think they work at all.. a mixture of old ideas and slick but dull motion graphics. still, maybe thats what the Five punters want. I suppose one thing to be thankful for is that Five seem to have got over wnating to be Channel 4 for a while. as they just don&#039;t have the vision or creativity to live up to it. I reckon much of this rebrand was design by committee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course its looks like a logo for Daz.. Five is the Tv equivalent. I&#8217;ve been trying to look at this rebrand objectively as I think Dixon Baxi are usually extremely good.. however&#8230; The logo I can understand. The old Five identity (although I loved it visually) was aloof at times and didn&#8217;t really fit with the &#8216;brand&#8217;. it was a well thought through stylised look for an ill thought through channel of crap. this one fits the bill much better. its brash, it feels a bit throw away and it&#8217;ll date in weeks. the idents are a strange collection, its a lovely idea to commission different idents from different artists but I don&#8217;t think they work at all.. a mixture of old ideas and slick but dull motion graphics. still, maybe thats what the Five punters want. I suppose one thing to be thankful for is that Five seem to have got over wnating to be Channel 4 for a while. as they just don&#8217;t have the vision or creativity to live up to it. I reckon much of this rebrand was design by committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euan</title>
		<link>http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/#comment-15843</link>
		<dc:creator>Euan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formfiftyfive.com/?p=2820#comment-15843</guid>
		<description>Neil your spot on! i thought of Daz washing powder when i first saw it. Not to say that it is Daz, and not one of its fabric cleaning competitors.

For me.. it&#039;s like someone has ran up to Tony Brook and slapped him in the face. It&#039;s doesn&#039;t have the instant appeal of the old... why move away from something that has more to offer? Bad times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil your spot on! i thought of Daz washing powder when i first saw it. Not to say that it is Daz, and not one of its fabric cleaning competitors.</p>
<p>For me.. it&#8217;s like someone has ran up to Tony Brook and slapped him in the face. It&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t have the instant appeal of the old&#8230; why move away from something that has more to offer? Bad times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/#comment-15835</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formfiftyfive.com/?p=2820#comment-15835</guid>
		<description>Looking at the application of the brand it grows on you but the first reaction to seeing it on TV but each time I&#039;m exposed to it on TV I can&#039;t help feel, like a few others here, it&#039;s dated and can&#039;t hold it&#039;s own as much as the previous identity by Spin could. 

Some of the onscreen visuals that go with application look pretty sweet though in places. I guess it&#039;s always very difficult branding something as huge as a TV channel and a terrestrial one for that must be a huge challenge. You&#039;ll never please everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the application of the brand it grows on you but the first reaction to seeing it on TV but each time I&#8217;m exposed to it on TV I can&#8217;t help feel, like a few others here, it&#8217;s dated and can&#8217;t hold it&#8217;s own as much as the previous identity by Spin could. </p>
<p>Some of the onscreen visuals that go with application look pretty sweet though in places. I guess it&#8217;s always very difficult branding something as huge as a TV channel and a terrestrial one for that must be a huge challenge. You&#8217;ll never please everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellie</title>
		<link>http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/#comment-15828</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formfiftyfive.com/?p=2820#comment-15828</guid>
		<description>Although it is a given improvement on the old logo I cant help feel it is dated and a half hearted attempt to bring the channel into the mainstream. It isnt fresh or new in any way. A sandwich of &#039;seen&#039; graphic devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it is a given improvement on the old logo I cant help feel it is dated and a half hearted attempt to bring the channel into the mainstream. It isnt fresh or new in any way. A sandwich of &#8216;seen&#8217; graphic devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APB</title>
		<link>http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/#comment-15815</link>
		<dc:creator>APB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formfiftyfive.com/?p=2820#comment-15815</guid>
		<description>Feels more suitable for the channel than the old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feels more suitable for the channel than the old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/#comment-15810</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formfiftyfive.com/?p=2820#comment-15810</guid>
		<description>Looks like a logo for washing powder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a logo for washing powder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katie</title>
		<link>http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/#comment-15808</link>
		<dc:creator>katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formfiftyfive.com/?p=2820#comment-15808</guid>
		<description>it ain&#039;t growing on me.. looks like either an 80s sports brand or some kind of aerosol deodorant..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it ain&#8217;t growing on me.. looks like either an 80s sports brand or some kind of aerosol deodorant..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/#comment-15806</link>
		<dc:creator>jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formfiftyfive.com/?p=2820#comment-15806</guid>
		<description>Why!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexparrott</title>
		<link>http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/#comment-15805</link>
		<dc:creator>alexparrott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formfiftyfive.com/?p=2820#comment-15805</guid>
		<description>I really like it too – but every time I see the logo I always think the F seems a little out of place as it&#039;s curve is not replicated anywhere else in the wordmark. To me this gives the impression of being lowercase, reading fIVE. Despite that I&#039;m still enjoying channel five more than usual!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like it too – but every time I see the logo I always think the F seems a little out of place as it&#8217;s curve is not replicated anywhere else in the wordmark. To me this gives the impression of being lowercase, reading fIVE. Despite that I&#8217;m still enjoying channel five more than usual!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolay</title>
		<link>http://www.formfiftyfive.com/2008/11/five-rebrand/#comment-15804</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formfiftyfive.com/?p=2820#comment-15804</guid>
		<description>Personally I find it way better than the old one.
It&#039;s more TV to me. Lovely job on the commissions DB did on the spots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I find it way better than the old one.<br />
It&#8217;s more TV to me. Lovely job on the commissions DB did on the spots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.formfiftyfive.com

Served from: www.formfiftyfive.com @ 2012-02-13 19:53:36 -->
