Comments on: Michael Jackson Tribute

By: Martin B

Martin B — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:50:09 +0000

Is it just me that thinks the most offensive thing about this is the fact that it’s another navel gazing graphic design Pantone reference?

It’s a book that has colours in it. I have an underwear drawer with some different coloured pairs of socks in it.

By: Patricia

Patricia — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:44:00 +0000

stupid pointless and so overdone.

By: Bill Starlin

Bill Starlin — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:36:37 +0000

Quite tacky an dinsensitive to be called a tribute.

By: character1

character1 — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:46:22 +0000

At the risk of jumping on the bandwagon I’m not into this either – it might have been a funny piece had he still been alive – now he’s dead it just feels like a bit of a cheap shot.

By: J.S.

J.S. — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:12:17 +0000

This is pretty insensitive. Yep: cheap.

By: Glenn

Glenn — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:08:04 +0000

Yeah I think tribute is maybe not the best title for this post?

By: Andy

Andy — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:03:32 +0000

How does pointing out skin tone for the sake of , what appears to be self promotion, act as a tribute??

I don’t get it.

In comparison to the array of existing designer Pantone gags out there this one doesn’t really do it for me…

By: Neil

Neil — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:27:33 +0000

Bit ‘meh’ for me

By: Aaron

Aaron — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:06:56 +0000

I agree — really cheap.

By: Sam

Sam — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:32:56 +0000

cheap